Romanucci & Blandin supports health care for all, but not at the risk of civil justice
at | Birth Injuries, Medical Malpractice
  • Medical malpractice has no place in the healthcare debate. Healthcare reform is about making sure that every American has access to quality, low-cost healthcare, not about limiting the legal rights of innocent patients harmed by medical negligence.
  • Tort reform does not improve the quality of our healthcare system or produce cost savings. Forty-eight states have already enacted at least one medical malpractice tort reform measure. Yet, these legal restrictions have done nothing to improve our health care system—forty seven million Americans still have no health care, costs are still escalating and 98,000 Americans still die each year from preventable medical errors. Limiting the legal rights of injured patients will do nothing to fix these problems.
  • Medical malpractice is about real people with real injuries. The Institute of Medicine estimates that 98,000 people die each year in the US from preventable medical errors. And, this number does not even include the countless other people who are injured by medical errors. Rather than reforming the legal system that protects these injured patients, we must focus on reforming the medical system in this country to prevent these errors from ever happening.
  • There is no medical malpractice crisis. In 2008, medical malpractice payments accounted for 0.2 percent of all health costs – the lowest level on record. Furthermore, researchers at the Harvard University School of Public Health have found that nearly all medical negligence claims are meritorious, with 97 percent involving medical injury and 80 percent involving physical injury resulting in major disability or death.
  • Americans should not have to give up rights in order to gain the right to healthcare. President Obama has repeatedly stated that in America, healthcare is a right. Likewise, Americans should not have to relinquish their constitutionally protected 7th Amendment rights to access quality healthcare.
  • Lawmakers should focus on the key issues. Achieving consensus on the health reform is an extremely delicate balance. Lawmakers must not unnecessarily insert extraneous, controversial issues such as tort reform into an already complicated issue.
  • Health courts would be an expensive, bureaucratic nightmare. They would exchange a patient’s constitutional right to a jury trial for a predetermined schedule of outcomes handed down by judges more interested in appeasing special interests than in rendering justice to the injured patients standing before them. And health courts would not protect patients from wrongdoers but would instead shield doctors and hospitals from accountability for their careless, harmful acts. Health courts truly are an unfair proposition for patients.

Categories

Contributors

Recent Posts

Archives

Jump to Page

DO YOU HAVE QUESTIONS?

Get a free consultation regarding your personal injury case today.

Tell Us About Your Case

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

* Indicates a required field.

Necessary Cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.